By James Simon, Esq., Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, LLP
In White Castle System, Inc., et al. v. West Chester Township Zoning Commission (June 9, 2008), 12th Dist. No. CA2007-07-157, 2008-Ohio-2738, the Twelfth District Court of Appeals examined an appeal of a decision by the West Chester Township Zoning Commission that dictated the traffic patterns and location of the drive-thru window in a proposed restaurant. The Appellant, White Castle, argued that the location and layout of the drive-thru was not subject to the Final Development Plan requirements under “C-PUD” zoning. The Twelfth District upheld the trial court’s findings that “a condition delineating the location of the drive-thru in order to enhance safety and aesthetics falls within the criteria to be considered and the discretion of the Zoning Commission. * * * the proposed plan advances the public health safety, welfare and morals.” Thus, the Zoning Commission was determined to be within their statutory powers to regulate the aesthetics of the building.